The Military Power Factor and Its Influence on Political and Territorial Transformations in the Context of Transition to a Post-Global World Order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2024-51-2-474-485Keywords:
world order, post-global world, military power, war, military conflictAbstract
The civilization period known as globalization, as well as the era of the bipolar world order that preceded it, is becoming history. The outgoing political scenery is being replaced by a world order, the contours of which are not yet fully realized and vague. Nevertheless, the main elements of the post-global world framework are already beginning to manifest themselves. The most noticeable among them are revealed at the level of national and international relations: the economic egoism, the tendency to autarkic practices, the renaissance of the "closed society" paradigm, the acute rise of religious nationalism, the reincarnation of alliance politics emerging in the spirit of the things as they were used in "warring kingdoms". The factor of military power continues to play a significant role in the transition from the global to the post-global order, both in terms of ideology and in the format of real politics. The events of the recent years highlighted the increasing importance of military force components employed as the tools of politics and politicians. Nations and their leaders have increasingly resorted to using military potentials to enhance their position in world politics or resolve political and territorial problems. It would not be an exaggeration to suppose that the collapse of the USSR and the period of relative stability that followed it, caused a number of wars and military conflicts. The author of the current paper will attempt to trace the upward dynamics of armed violence taking into account a range of armed conflicts and the resulting political and territorial changes happened in the Eurasian geopolitical space. The author will consider this problem in the context of the emerging transition of the world community to a new order of mutual relations.
Funding
The work was carried out without external sources of funding.
Downloads
References
Дугин А.Г. 2020. Постлиберальный порядок. Неизбежность. Москва, Академия Тринитаризма. Электронный номер 77–6567, публ. 26238, 23 марта. http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0009/001a/00091156.htm (дата обращения: 07.04.2024).
Иванов С.Б. 2003. Военная энциклопедия. М., Военное издательство, Т. 7, 735 с.
Конышев В.Н., Парфенов Р.В. 2019. Гибридные войны: между мифом и реальностью. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 63(12): 56–66. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-56-66.
Лавров С.В. 2021. О праве, правах и правилах. Россия в глобальной политике. 4, Июль-август. https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/o-prave-pravah-i-pravilah/ (дата обращения: 13.04.2024).
Путин В.В. 2024. Интервью Такеру Карлсону. Официальное интернет-представительство Президента России, 9 февраля. http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73411 (дата обращения: 19.04.2024).
Путин В.В. 2023. Послание Президента Федеральному Собранию. Официальное интернет-представительство Президента России, 21 февраля. http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70565 (дата обращения: 07.04.2024).
Сивков К.В., Соколов К.Н. 2023. Гибридная война. М., Наше завтра, 280 с.
Biden J.R. 2023. Remarks by President Biden at a Campaign Reception, October 20. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/10/20/remarks-by-president-biden-at-a-campaign-reception-3/ (accessed: 13.04.2024).
Blinken E.J. 2023. Secretary Blinken Outlines the Power and Purpose of American Diplomacy in a New Era in Speech at Johns Hopkins SAIS. September, 13. U.S. Department of State. Office of the Spokesperson. https://www.state.gov/secretary-blinken-outlines-the-power-and-purpose-of-american-diplomacy-in-a-new-era-in-speech-at-johns-hopkins-sais/ (accessed: 13.04.2024).
Brzezinski Z.K. 2012. Strategic Vision. America and the Crisis of Global Power. New York, Basic Books, 433 p.
Byman D. 2024. Stuck in Gaza. Six Months After October 7, Israel Still Lacks a Viable Strategy. Foreign Affairs, April 5. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/hamas-israel-stuck-gaza? (accessed: 16.04.2024).
Çevik S. 2022. Turkey's Military Operations in Syria and Iraq. German Institute for International and Security Affairs. 37 (May): 1–8.
CSIS. 2024. 2024 Global Forecast: A World Dividing. Center for Strategic and International Studies. January-February. https://features.csis.org/global-forecast-2024/ (accessed: 11.04.2024).
Davis S., Petterssen T., Öberg M. 2023. Organized Violence 1989–2022, and the Return of Conflict Between States. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. Journal of Peace Research. 60(4): 691–708. DOI: 10.1177/00223433231185169.
De Waal T. 2023. The End of Nagorno-Karabakh. How Western Inaction Enabled Azerbaijan and Russia. Foreign Affairs, September 23. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/armenia/end-nagorno-karabakh (accessed: 16.04.2024).
Fard R. 2021. Towards a New Concept of Constructivist Geopolitics. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies. 15(1): 26–57.
Gardó S., Martin R. 2010. The Impact of the Global Economic and Financial Crisis on Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. European Central Bank. Occasional Paper. 114 /June, 67 p.
Georgieva K. 2023. The Price of Fragmentation. Why the Global Economy Isn't Ready for the Shocks Ahead. Foreign Affairs. September-October. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/price-fragmentation-global-economy-shock? (accessed: 15.04.2024).
IISS. 2023. The Armed Conflict Survey 2023. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://www.iiss.org/en/publications/armed-conflict-survey/ (accessed: 09.04.2024). DOI:10.4324/9781003465379.
Jahn B. 2018. Liberal Internationalism: Historical Trajectory and Current Prospects. International Affairs. 94(1): 43–61. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iix231.
James P. 2005. Arguing Globalizations: Propositions Towards an Investigation of Global Formation. Globalizations. 2(2): 193–209. DOI:10.1080/14747730500202206.
Kashin V.B., Sushentsov A.A. 2024. Warfare in a New Epoch: The Return of Big Armies. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1): 32–56. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2024-22-1-32-56.
Kissinger H.A. 2020. The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever After the World Order. The Wall Street Journal. April 3. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coronavirus-pandemic-will-forever-alter-the-world-order-11585953005 (accessed: 10.04.2024).
Kissinger H.A. 2022. We're Heading into a Very Difficult Period. The Sunday Times Magazine. June 11: 34–39.
Landgraf W., Seferian N. 2024. A «Frozen Conflict» Boils Over: Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023 and Future Implications. Foreign Policy Research Institute. Report, January 18. https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/01/a-frozen-conflict-boils-over-nagorno-karabakh-in-2023-and-future-implications/ (accessed: 14.04.2024).
Layne C. 1993. The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Power Will Rise. International Security. 17(4): 5-51.
Lighthizer R.E., Hanson G.H. 2024. After Free Trade. Foreign Affairs. March-April. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/responses/after-free-trade (accessed: 07.04.2024).
Lobanov K., Selin B. 2021. Human Security and State Functioning in the Context of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic COVID-19. Универзитет у Београду. Годишњак факултета безбедности: 145–159. DOI:10.5937/fb_godisnjak0-35440.
Maliqi A. 2023. The Kosovo-Serbia Conundrum Reaches a Breaking Point: Kosovo's North Emerges as Europe's Most Vulnerable Spot Outside Ukraine. In: Western Balkans 2023: Assessment of Internal Challenges and External Threats. Ed. by T.L. Domi. The New Line Institute for Strategy and Policy. September, 46 p.
McCuen J. 2008. Hybrid Wars. Military review, 88(2): 107–113.
Okonjo-Iweala N. 2023. WTO Chief Wants on Very Costly Fragmentation of Global Economy. Nikkei Asia. October 30. https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Picks/Interview/WTO-chief-warns-on-very-costly-fragmentation-of-global-economy (accessed: 07.04.2024).
Peet J. 2008. Frozen Conflicts. The Economist. November 19. https/www.economist.com/news/2008/11/19/frozen-conflicts? (accessed: 14.04.2024).
Peters A., Askin E. 2020. Der internationale Menschenrechtsschutz in Zeiten von Postglobalismus und Populismus. MPIL Research Series, 13, Berlin, Max Planck Institute, 18 s. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3590257.
Rudd K. 2023. Ten Alternative Futures for U.S. – China Relations. The Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development (CIRSD). Horizons. Winter, 22. https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-winter-2023--issue-no22/ten-alternative-futures--for-us-china-relations (accessed: 16.04.2024).
Urhová D. 2024. Anti-Western Axis of China, Russia and Iran Forging Closer Ties Amid Growing Tensions in the Middle East. China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe (CHOICE). March 26. https://chinaobservers.eu/anti-western-axis-of-china-russia-and-iran-forging-closer-ties-amid-growing-tensions-in-the-middle-east (accessed:11.04.2024).
Abstract views: 88
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Via in tempore. History and political science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.