The Level of Digitalization and the Development of Democracy in Different Countries of the World: A Quantitative Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2025-52-1-258-267

Keywords:

digital authoritarianism, digital democracy, political regime, correlation, clusters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the potential for different countries to develop digital democracy, based on their level of digitalization and democratization. To do this, we conducted a quantitative analysis using methods such as correlation and clustering. The correlation analysis revealed a mod-erate positive relationship between digitalization and democratic development, with a correlation coefficient of 0.56 using a Pearson test. Clustering analysis identified four clusters of countries, based on their propensity for digital democracy. These clusters include North America, Western Europe, Northern Europe, and a few countries in Eastern and Southeast Asia, which have the high-est levels of digitalization and democracy. On the other hand, the cluster that is least likely to em-brace digital democracy consists primarily of authoritarian states in Asia and Africa. These coun-tries have a wide range of digitalization levels, indicating a greater tendency towards digital autocra-cy rather than democracy. The paper provides examples of digital authoritarianism and reveals the limitations of the research results stemming from the possible incomplete objectivity of the Democ-racy Index.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vsevolod A. Voronin, St. Petersburg State University

Undergraduate Student at the Faculty of Political Science, St. Petersburg State University,
St. Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: 0009-0002-2859-6427
E-mail: sevvy@inbox.ru

References

Список источников

В Евросоюзе начали блокировать сайты российских СМИ. 2024. Lenta.ru. URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2024/06/26/v-evrosoyuze-nachali-blokirovat-sayty-rossiyskih-smi/ (дата обращения: 20.01.2025)

Democracy Index by Country. World Population Review. Available at: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/democracy-index-by-country (дата обращения: 20.11.2024)

Global Digitalization Index (GDI). 2024. Available at: https://www.huawei.com/en/gdi (дата обращения: 20.11.2024)

How is digital technology affecting democracy? University of Sheffield. Department of Politics and International Relations. Available at: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/politics/research/how-digital-technology-affecting-democracy (дата обращения: 19.01.2025)

Study on the impact of digital transformation on democracy and good governance. Council of Europe. 2021. Report. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/study-on-the-impact-of-digital-transformation-on-democracy-and-good-go/1680a3b9f9 (дата обращения: 19.01.2025)

The positive impact of digitalization on democracy – best practices on e-governance from Ghana, Estonia, and India. Supporting democracy worldwide. Available at: https://www.idea.int/news/positive-impact-digitalization-democracy-best-practices-e-governance-ghana-estonia-and-india (дата обращения: 19.01.2025)

Список литературы

Власова О.Ю. 2020. Цифровой авторитаризм и электронная демократия: содержание и границы. Studia Humanitatis. 3: 6–29.

Гарбузарова Е.Г. 2024. Особенности политических процессов в странах Центральной Азии на современном этапе. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. 26(3): 477–490. doi: 10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-3-477-490

Дзидзоев Р.М., Лолаева А.С. 2022. Цифровая (электронная) демократия в России: понятие и пределы. Юридический вестник Кубанского государственного университета. 2: 14–20. doi: 10.31429/20785836-14-2-14-20.

Кабанов Ю.А. 2016. Электронный авторитаризм (Институт электронного участия в недемократических странах). Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз (Журнал политической философии и социологии политики). 4(83): 36–55.

Мальченков С.А., Сударев А.А. 2023. Цифровая демократия как новая форма народовластия: преимущества и недостатки. Огарёв-Online. 8(193): 1–8.

Маневский Е.В. 2019. Факторы развития электронной демократии в современном обществе. Политика и общество. 2: 15–20. doi: 10.7256/2454-0684.2019.2.21852.

Мясников А.И., Воробьев М., Прохоров А.В. 2024. Интернет-дискурс современных общественно-политических движений как способ саморепрезентации (на примере движения желтых жилетов). Вестник СНО Санкт-Петербургского университета. Науки об обществе. 1(1): 32−49. doi.org/10.21638/spbu36.2023.102

Никулина Ю.В. 2016. Цифровая демократия и электронное участие в информационном обществе. Научные труды Республиканского института высшей школы. Философско-гуманитарные науки. 15: 97–104.

Першина Е.В. 2007. Внешний фактор трансформации тоталитарных режимов на примере стран Восточной Европы. Автореф. дис. канд. полит. наук. Уфа: Башкирский государственный университет, 142.

Хайруллова А.В. 2023. Использование искусственного интеллекта «Единой Россией» на губернаторских выборах 2023 г. Новая политическая реальность: возможности и вызовы: Сборник тезисов XIV Международной молодежной научной конференции, Санкт-Петербург, 18 ноября 2023 года. – Санкт-Петербург: ООО «Скифия-принт». 25–26.

Jones M.O. 2022. Digital Repression for Authoritarian Evolution in Saudi Arabia. In: New Authoritarian Practices in the Middle East and North Africa. Cambridge University Press.

Huntington S.P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.

Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press.

Schmidt-Feuerheerd B. 2024. Collaborative Authoritarianism and its Unintended Consequences. Democratization, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2432018

Xu X., Kostka G., & Cao X. 2022. Information Control and Public Support for Social Credit Systems in China. The Journal of Politics, 84(4), 2230–2245. https://doi.org/10.1086/718358

References

Vlasova O.Yu. 2020. Tsifrovoj avtoritarizm i elektronnаjа demokratija: soderzhanie i granitsy [Digital Authoritarianism and Electronic Democracy: Content and Boundaries]. Studia Humanitatis. 3: 6–29.

Garbuzarova E.G. 2024. Osobennosti politicheskix processov v stranax Central'noj Azii na sovremennom etape [Features of Political Processes in Central Asian Countries at the Present Stage]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Politologija. 26(3): 477–490. doi: 10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-3-477-490.

Dzidzoev R.M., Lolaeva A.S. 2022. Tsifrovaja (jelektronnaja) demokratija v Rossii: ponjatie i predely [Digital (Electronic) Democracy in Russia: Concept and Limits]. Juridicheskij vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2: 14–20. doi: 10.31429/20785836-14-2-14-20.

Kabanov Yu.A. 2016. Jelektronnyj avtoritarizm (Institut jelektronnogo uchastija v nedemokraticheskix stranax) [Electronic Authoritarianism (Institute of Electronic Participation in Non-Democratic Countries)]. Politija: Analiz. Xronika. Prognoz (Zhurnal politicheskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki). 4(83): 36–55.

Mal’chenkov S.A., Sudarev A.A. 2023. Tsifrovaja demokratija kak novaja forma narodovlastija: preimushhestva i nedostatki [Digital Democracy as a New Form of Popular Sovereignty: Advantages and Disadvantages]. Ogaryov-Online. 8(193): 1–8.

Manevskij E.V. 2019. Faktory razvitija jelektronnoj demokratiji v sovremennom obshhestve [Factors in the Development of Electronic Democracy in Modern Society]. Politika i obshhestvo. 2: 15–20. doi: 10.7256/2454-0684.2019.2.21852.

Myasnikov A.I., Vorob'ev M., Proxorov A.V. 2024. Internet-diskurs sovremennyx obshhestvenno-politicheskix dvizhenskij kak sposob samoreprezentacii (na primere dvizhenskij zheltyx zhiletov) [Internet Discourse of Contemporary Socio-Political Movements as a Way of Self-Representation (On the Example of the Yellow Vests Movement)]. Vestnik SNO Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Nauki ob obshhestve. 1(1): 32−49. doi.org/10.21638/spbu36.2023.102.

Nikulinа Yu.V. 2016. Tsifrovaja demokratija i jelektronnoe uchastie v informacionnom obshhestve [Digital Democracy and Electronic Participation in the Information Society]. Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshej shkoly. Filosofsko-gumanitarnye nauki. 15: 97–104.

Pershina E.V. 2007. Vneshnij faktor transformacii totalitarnyx rezhimov na primere stran Vostochnoj Yevropy [External Factor in the Transformation of Totalitarian Regimes: The Example of Eastern European Countries]. Avtoreferat dis. kand. polit. nauk. Ufa: Bashkirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 142.

Khayrullova A.V. 2023. Ispol'zovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta "Yedinoy Rossiey" na gubernatorskix vyborax 2023 g. [The Use of Artificial Intelligence by "United Russia" in the 2023 Gubernatorial Elections]. Novaya politicheskaya real'nost': vozmozhnosti i vyzovy: Sbornik tezisov XIV Mezhdunarodnoj molodezhnoy nauchnoj konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 18 noyabrya 2023 goda. – Sankt-Peterburg: OOO "Skifiya-print". 25–26.

Jones M.O. 2022. Digital Repression for Authoritarian Evolution in Saudi Arabia. In: New Authoritarian Practices in the Middle East and North Africa. Cambridge University Press.

Huntington S.P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.

Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press.

Schmidt-Feuerheerd B. 2024. Collaborative Authoritarianism and its Unintended Consequences. Democratization, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2432018

Xu X., Kostka G., & Cao X. 2022. Information Control and Public Support for Social Credit Systems in China. The Journal of Politics, 84(4), 2230–2245. https://doi.org/10.1086/718358


Abstract views: 9

Share

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Voronin, V. A. (2025). The Level of Digitalization and the Development of Democracy in Different Countries of the World: A Quantitative Analysis. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 52(1), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2025-52-1-258-267

Issue

Section

Topical issues of political science