Arctic Science Diplomacy Index for a Region (the Case of Saint Petersburg)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2023-50-3-790-800

Keywords:

Arctic, Arctic Science Diplomacy, Region, Index, Saint Petersburg

Abstract

The growing interest in the Arctic among states in the field of international relations has led to the inclusion of many non-state actors. These kinds of actors also demonstrate an interest in researching regional processes, which has led to the emergence of Arctic scientific diplomacy as a distinct phenomenon. This article attempts to define and measure the concept of Arctic scientific diplomacy of the region – or a state subject in a form of an administrative unit – by identifying its key indicators. The author has identified four main indicators that can be used to analyze and evaluate the index of Arctic scientific diplomacy of the region. Using Saint Petersburg as an example, the article demonstrates that it is possible to provide a qualitative assessment of the results of Arctic scientific diplomacy activities even for a subject that is not considered Arctic by geographical criteria. In conclusion, possible directions for further research of the issue can be followed by studies of a more comprehensive criteria system as well as some comparative studies of particular regions.

Author Biography

Fedor E. Zolotarev, Saint Petersburg State University

PhD Student at the Faculty of International Relations, Saint Petersburg State University,
Saint Petersburg, Russia

References

Гомелаури А.С. 2020. Субъект федерации как канал «мягкой силы» государства (на примере Санкт-Петербурга). Via in tempore. История. Политология, 47 (3): 658–668. doi: https://doi.org/10.18413/2687-0967-2020-47-3-658-668

Гутенев М.Ю., Митина Ю.С. 2022. Научная дипломатия неарктических стран в Арктике. Теории и проблемы политических исследований, 11 (1А): 170–182. doi: 10.34670/AR.2022.48.61.020

Гутенев М.Ю., Сергунин А.А. 2022. Арктическая научная дипломатия России: теория и практика. Вестник международных организаций, 17 (3): 155–174. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-03-06

Дежина И.Г. 2023. Научная дипломатия в Индии. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/nauchnaya-diplomatiya-v-indii/ (дата обращения: 26.04.2023).

Дипломатические практики содействия международному научному сотрудничеству в России: Доклад No 74 (аналитический доклад) / Авт. колл.: Г.А. Краснова, И.Г Дежин, Р.О. Райнхардт, О.И. Шакиров / Российский совет по международным делам. М., НП РСМД, 2021. 41 с.

Крынжина М.Д. 2018. Научная дипломатия в интерпретациях российских специалистов. Международные процессы, 4 (55): 193–208. doi: 10.17994/IT.2018.16.4.55.12.

Ильина И.Е., Маленко С.В., Васильева И.Н., Реброва Т.П. 2021. Модель реализации научной дипломатии: зарубежный и российский опыт. Управление наукой и наукометрия, 16 (1): 10–46. doi: 10.33873/2686-6706.2021.16–1.10–46.

Лобанов А.В., Рязанцева Е.А. 2020. Ключевые задачи и направления работы Комитета Санкт-Петербурга по делам Арктики. Базис, 1 (7): 80–85.

Heininen L. 2016. Future Security of the Global Arctic. London, Palgrave Pivot London, 144 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468253

Landriault M., Payette J.F., Roussel S. 2023. Mapping Arctic Paradiplomacy: Limits and Opportunities for Sub-National Actors in Arctic Governance. London and New York, Routledge, 241 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131311

Mauduit J.C., Soler M.G. 2020. Building a Science Diplomacy Curriculum. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.00138/full (accessed: 26.05.2023).

Mazziotti M., Pareto A. 2023. Methods for Constructing Composite Indicies: One for all or all for one? Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/12/Rivista2013_Mazziotta_Pareto.pdf (accessed: 30.06.2023).

Ruffini P.B. 2020. Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 7: 124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5

Sabzalieva E., Sá C.M., Martinez M., Kachynska N. 2021. Science Diplomacy Policy Processes in Comparative Perspective: The Use of Scientific Cooperation Agreements in Canada, India, Norway, and the UK. Minerva, 59: 149–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09429-y

Sergunin A., Konyshev V. 2019. Forging Russia’s Arctic strategy: actors and decision-making. The Polar Journal, 9 (1): 75–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2019.1618549


Abstract views: 53

Share

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Zolotarev, F. E. (2023). Arctic Science Diplomacy Index for a Region (the Case of Saint Petersburg). Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 50(3), 790-800. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2023-50-3-790-800

Issue

Section

Topical issues of political science