Direct Democracy under the Conditions of One Party Ruling in Modern Vietnam

Direct Democracy under the Conditions of One Party Ruling in Modern Vietnam

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-3-701-710

Keywords:

democracy, direct democracy, political party, ruling party, ensuring democracy, form of democracy, politics of Vietnam

Abstract

The issue of direct democracy is a concern of many countries around the world, including Vietnam. The implementation of direct democracy is the basis for ensuring the power of the people. Therefore, together with representative democracy, the implementation of direct forms of democracy is of indispensable importance in modern states. Currently, most countries tend to expand the form of direct democracy along with strengthening and promoting the effectiveness of representative democracy, in order to ensure the strong promotion of civil rights in the exercise of state power.  As a country with a political regime with only one ruling Party, Vietnam is in the process of promoting the democratization of political, economic and socio-cultural life, identify democracy as both a goal and a driving force for national reform and renewal. Direct democracy is specified in the Constitution and law of Vietnam with many forms of implementation such as: referendums, elections, dismissals of voters, contributions to draft policies and laws of the State, inspection and supervision of the operation of the State apparatus, complaints, denunciations, protests... etc. As the only ruling party in Vietnam, the Communist Party of Vietnam has always focused on expanding the form of direct democracy to ensure the true mastery of the people, however, the effectiveness of this form of democracy in Vietnam now faces many challenges such as: issues of people's level, inadequacies of the legal system, the culture of public service performance of civil servants, the psychology of relying on the party and state of the people ... The article focuses on clarifying the role of direct democracy, analyzing the Communist Party of Vietnam's position system on direct democracy and recognizing the limitations in the implementation of this form of democracy in modern Vietnam.

Author Biographies

Tu Thi Thoa, The state university of management; Ho Chi Minh City University of Physical Education and Sports

Ph.D. graduate student of The state university of management,
Moscow, Russia;

Lecturer, deputy dean of the Faculty of Political Theory and Pedagogy, Ho Chi Minh City University of Physical Education and Sports,
Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

ORCID: 0000-0002-8579-1846

Nguyen Duc Cuong, The state university of management; Academy of Politics Region 2

Ph.D. graduate student of The state university of management,
Moscow, Russia;

Lecturer, Deputy Head of Administrative Department, Journal of Political Science, Academy of Politics Region 2,
Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

ORCID: 0000-0002-4404-0288

References

Руденко В.Н. 2003. Прямая демократия: модели правления, конституционно-правовые институты. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН.

Bauer P.C., Fatke M. 2014. Direct Democracy and Political Trust: Enhancing Trust, Initiating Distrust Or Both? Swiss Political Science Review 20 (1): 49–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12071

Bowler S., Donovan T. 2004. Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (3): 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F153244000400400305

Chang W.-C. 2021. Direct Democracy and Party Membership: Testing the Role of Political Efficacy, Political Studies Review. August 2021. doi:10.1177/14789299211034278

Communist Party of Vietnam. 1993. Document of the 5th Meeting of the 7th Central Committee, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, p. 86 (in Vietnamese).

Communist Party of Vietnam. 2021. Document of the 13th National Congress, volume 1, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, p. 93 (in Vietnamese).

Dinh Ngoc Vuong. 2005. On referendum institutions, Journal of Legislative Research, No. 8, p. 11–16 (in Vietnamese).

Dyck J.J., Seabrook N.R. 2010. Mobilized by Direct Democracy: Short-Term Versus Long-Term Effects and the Geography of Turnout in Ballot Measure Elections, Social Science Quarterly 91 (1): 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00688.x

Fatke M. 2014. Allure or Alternative? Direct Democracy and Party Identification, Party Politics 20 (2): 248–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068813520271

Ho Ba Tham. 2012. Awareness and implementation of democracy in the rule of law in our country today, Journal of Legislative Studies, (22), p. 26–30 (in Vietnamese).

Ladner A., Braendle M. 1999. Does Direct Democracy Matter for Political Parties? An Empirical Test in the Swiss Cantons, Party Politics 5 (3): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068899005003002

Lijphart A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Nguyen Dang Dung. 2018. The role of elections, Journal of Law, Volume 34, No. 1 (2018) p. 1–8 (in Vietnamese).

Nguyen Dang Dung, The First Direct Democracy of Humanity, Components and Limitations, Proceedings of the Workshop «Direct Democracy, Democracy in the World and in Vietnam» organized by the Union of Vietnamese Science and Technology Associations in Hanoi on March 10, 2014 (in Vietnamese).

Nguyen Thi Dung. 2018. Direct Democracy – Concepts and Methods of Implementation, Journal of Industry and Trade, No. 3, 2018 (in Vietnamese).

Nguyen Van Son. 2014. Political Culture in the Formation of Democratic Institutions in the Period of Industrialization and Modernization, Journal of Philosophy, No. 8, p. 3–10 (in Vietnamese).

Nguyen Viet Thong. 2013. The Views of the Communist Party of Vietnam on democracy and the practice of democracy before and from the renovation to the present, Journal of Philosophy, (10), p. 3–10 (in Vietnamese).

Peters Y. 2016. (Re)join the Party! The Effects of Direct Democracy on Party Membership in Europe, European Journal of Political Research 55: 138–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12120

Pham Ngoc Tram. 2011. The process of reforming the political system in Vietnam from 1986 to 2011, National Political Publishing, Hanoi (in Vietnamese).

Phan Tan. 2013. Transforming thinking about democracy and some achievements made through assessment from practice after more than 20 years of renovation, Journal of Social Science Information, (4), p. 1–7 (in Vietnamese).

Sen A. 1999. Democracy as a Universal Value, Journal of Democracy, 10, p. 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1353/JOD.1999.0055

Tao Thi Quyen. 2014. Developing Forms of Democracy and Direct Democracy, Journal of Political Reasoning (2), p. 20–28 (in Vietnamese).

Thomas E. Cronin, Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).

Trinh Quoc Tuan. 2004. Correlation between socialist democracy and socialist market economy, Journal of Socialist Information – Theory and Practice, (3), p. 6–8 (in Vietnamese).

Truong Minh Tuan. 2012. Socialist Democracy and the Implementation of Socialist Democracy in the spirit of the 11th Party Congress, Journal of Philosophy, (1), p. 3–8 (in Vietnamese).

Truong Thanh Trung (Editor). 2011. The Truth of Democracy and Human Rights in the strategy of «peaceful evolution» in Vietnam, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi (in Vietnamese).

Vu Cong Giao. 2014. Direct Democracy in the World and Direct Democracy in Our Country, Journal of Legislative Studies No. 21 (277), November 2014 (in Vietnamese).

Vu Van Vien. 2015. The issue of democratization in the economy in Vietnam today, Journal of Philosophy, (1), p. 25–31 (in Vietnamese).


Abstract views: 154

Share

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Thi Thoa, T., & Cuong, N. D. (2022). Direct Democracy under the Conditions of One Party Ruling in Modern Vietnam: Direct Democracy under the Conditions of One Party Ruling in Modern Vietnam. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 49(3), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-3-701-710

Issue

Section

Topical issues of political science