The Return of Ideology: Personological Nuance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-3-690-700

Keywords:

ideology, the Big Five, United States elections, liberalism, conservatism

Abstract

The article examines the change in the nature of the political struggle in the United States, which can be described as the «return of ideology»: a turn from building political platforms as serving the interests of a complex combination of various groups to traditional ideologies, appealing, respectively, to the left – liberal – and right – conservative beliefs. The peculiarity of this «return» is that the foundations of traditional ideologies are associated with personological studies of recent years, which indicate a significant influence of stable personal characteristics on individual ideological preferences, while these characteristics demonstrate a high level of heritability, in other words, are largely congenital. The establishment of this connection changes the public perception of ideologies, turning them from a screen for economic interests into an expression of the fundamental features of certain types of people who, moreover, define themselves in the political field through opposition to each other. The article examines the influence of these theories on the understanding of the political process and their ability to provoke an aggravation of the political struggle.

Author Biography

Semen A. Gasparyan, MGIMO University

teacher of the Department of English No. 6, MGIMO University,
Moscow, Russia
ORCID: 0000-0002-7392-4015

References

Адорно Т. 2012. Исследование авторитарной личности. М., АСТ, 416 с.

Кембриджская школа: теория и практика интеллектуальной истории. 2018. Сост. Т. Атнашев, М. Велижев. М., Новое литературное обозрение, 632 с.

Остин Дж. 1999. Избранное. М., Идея-Пресс, 332 с.

Пинкер С. 2021. Чистый лист. М., Альпина нон-фикшен, 608 с.

Уилсон Э. 2015. О природе человека. М., Кучково поле, 352 с.

Шмитт К. 2016а. Духовно-историческое состояние современного парламентаризма. Понятие политического. СПб., Наука, 93–170.

Шмитт К. 2016б. Понятие политического. СПб., Наука, 280–408.

Alford, J.R., Funk, C.L., & Hibbing J.R. 2005. Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review. 99 (2), 153–167.

Altemeyer B. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 352 p.

Bell D. 1960. The End of Ideology. New York: Free Press, 416 p.

Block J., Block J. 2006. Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality. 40 (5), 734–749.

Bouchard T.J., Segal N.L., Tellegen M.K., & Krueger R. 2003. Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson conservatism scale: A reared-apart twins study of social attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences. 34 (6), 959–969.

Caprara G., Veccione M. 2017. Personalizing Politics and Realizing Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Costa P., McCrae R. 2017. The NEO Inventories as Instruments of Psychological Theory. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Five Factor Model. Edited by Widiger T. New York: Oxford University Press, 589 p.

Gibney E. 2018. The scant science behind Cambridge Analytica’s controversial marketing techniques. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-03880-4. Accessed: 18.08.2022, 270–280.

Green J. 2017. Devil’s Bargain: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump and the National Uprising. New York: Penguin, 304 p.

Hatemi et. al. 2011. A Genome-Wide Analysis of Liberal and Conservative Political Attitudes. Journal of Politics. 73 (1), 271–285.

Jost J. 2021. Left and Right. The Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction. New York: Oxford University Press, 145 p.

Mak T. 2018. Another 'Civil War'? Pessimism About Political Violence Deepens In A Divided Nation. URL: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/31/662216598/another-civil-war-pessimism-about-political-violence-deepens-in-a-divided-nation Accessed: 18.08.2022.

Moscovici S. 2001. Social Representations. New York: New York University Press, 2001, 3–69.

The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt. 2016. Edited by Meierhenrich J., Simons O. New York: Oxford University Press, 867–872.

Robinson W. 2022. Global Civil War: Capitalism Post-Pandemic. Oakland: PM Press, 2022, 224 p.

Schretlen D., Van Der Hulst E., Pearlson G., Gordon B. 2010. A Neuropsychological Study of Personality: Trait Openness in Relation to Intelligence, Fluency, and Executive Functioning. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology. 32 (10), 1068–1073.

Sidanius J., Pratto F., Bobo L. 1994. Social Dominance Orientation and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Case of Invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67 (6), 998–1011.

Wright R. 2020. Is America Becoming a Banana Republic? URL: https:// www. Newyo rker.com/news/our-columnists/is-america-becoming-a-banana-republic Accessed: 18.08.2022.


Abstract views: 107

Share

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Gasparyan, S. A. (2022). The Return of Ideology: Personological Nuance. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 49(3), 690-700. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-3-690-700

Issue

Section

Topical issues of political science