Isolationism in Contemporary US Foreign Policy Thought: The Quincy Coalition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2023-50-2-515-525

Keywords:

US foreign policy, interventionism, realism, libertarianism, liberalism

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study the main postulates of the so-called Quincy coalition, which expresses the views of modern American isolationism and containment in foreign policy. The authors, based on the method of comparative analysis, analyze the approaches of modern libertarianism, realism and left-liberal progressives, and come to the conclusion that the American expert-academic discourse is debatable, polyphonic and ambiguous in assessments, methods and approaches. The results of the study will allow Russian departments that carry out Russia's foreign policy to conduct more effective interaction with American counterparts in solving the most complex problems of the modern world.

Author Biographies

Sergey V. Starkin, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; Linguistics University of Nizhny Novgorod

Professor, Head of the Department of Political Science, Nizhny Novgorod State University. N.I. Lobachevsky;
Senior Research Fellow, International Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory "Study of World and Regional Socio-Political Processes", Nizhny Novgorod State University N.A. Dobrolyubov,
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Elena S. Pripisnova, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Nizhny Novgorod State University N.I. Lobachevsky,
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Elena V. Gnezdova, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Regional Studies and Local History, Nizhny Novgorod State University. N.I. Lobachevsky,
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

References

Пикетти Т. 2016. Капитализм в XXI веке. М., Ад Маргинем, 592 c.

Хайек Ф. 2021. Дорога к рабству. М., АСТ, 352 c.

Хомский Н. 2018. Оптимизм вопреки отчаянию. М., Рипол-Классик, 485 c.

Boaz D. 2015. The Libertarian Mind: A Manifesto for Freedom. New York: Simon & Schuster. 432 p.

Chomsky N. 2002. American Power and the New Mandarins. New York., The New Press. 432 p.

Deudney D., Ikenberry G.J. 2021. Misplaced Restraint: The Quincy Coalition Versus Liberal Internationalism // Survival, 63 (4): 7–32.

Kolko G., Kolko J. 1972. The Limits of Power: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1945–1954. New York., Harper & Row, 820 p.

Mearsheimer J. 2014. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York., WW Norton & Company, 592 p.

Pitts J. 2006. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 400 p.

Posen B. 2020. Europe Can Defend Itself // Survival, 62 (6): 7–34.

Zinn H. 2015. A People’s History of the United States. New York, Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 784 p.

Bacevich A. 2002. American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of US Diplomacy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 312 p.

Deudney D., Ikenberry J. 2017. Realism, Liberalism, and the Iraq War. Survival, 59 (4): 7–26.

Deudney D., Bounding Power. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 384 p.

Gardner L.C. 1987. Safe for Democracy: The Anglo-American Response to Revolution, 1813–1923. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 400 p.

Haslam J. 2013. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven, Yale University Press, 272 p.

Immerwahr D. 2019. How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 528 p.

Lieven A. 2021. Vindicating Realist Internationalism. Survival, 63 (5): 7–34.

Mazarr M.J. 2020. Rethinking Restraint: Why It Fails in Practice. Washington Quarterly, 42 (2): 7–32.

Mearsheimer J. 2019. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven, Yale University Press, 328 p.

Posen B. 2015. Restraint: A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy. New York, Cornell University Press, 256 p.

Preble C. 2009. The Power Problem: How American Military Dominance Makes Us Less Safe, Less Prosperous, and Less Free. New York, Cornell University Press, 232 p.

Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. Quincy Institute Experts Applaud Biden for Ending America’s “Forever” War in Afghanistan’. 21 April 2021, https://quincyinst.org/press/quincy-institute-experts-applaud-biden-for-ending-mericas-forever-war-in-afghanistan/. (accessed: 22.01.2023).

Reid-Henry S. 2019. Empire of Democracy: The Remaking of the West Since the Cold War, 1971–2015. New York, Simon & Schuster, 880 p.

Slobodian Q. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 400 p.

Wohlforth W.C. 2011. Gilpinian Realism and International Relations. International Relations, 24 (1): 499–511.

Wohlforth W. C. 1999. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, 24 (1): 5–41.

Wright T. 2016. Trump’s 19th Century Foreign Policy. Politico, 20 January 2016. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-foreign-policy-213546/. (accessed: 22.01.2023).


Abstract views: 67

Share

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Starkin, S. V., Pripisnova, E. S., & Gnezdova, E. V. (2023). Isolationism in Contemporary US Foreign Policy Thought: The Quincy Coalition. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 50(2), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2023-50-2-515-525

Issue

Section

Topical issues of political science

Most read articles by the same author(s)