Principles of the Transfer of Imperial Power in Late Antique Society

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2023-50-2-344-354

Keywords:

power, emperor, empire, dynasty, usurpation

Abstract

This article discusses the dynastic policy and principles of the transfer of imperial power in the Roman Empire in the 4th-5th centuries. A.D. Specific historical examples show the mechanisms for the transfer of power, political institutions that take part in the approval of the new emperor to the throne.
The article analyzes eight different ways of transferring imperial power, starting from the era of the principate:
1) dynastic transfer of power according to the consanguineous model;
2) co-government;
3) co-optation to power on the basis of personal merit, «selection of the best»;
4) selection and approval of the emperor by the senate (candidate senate);
5) rebellion and rebellion of individual legions and military formations and their nomination of the emperor, usurpation of power;
6) adoption;
7) appointment as emperor by a barbarian king or a powerful magister militum or patrician;
8) marriage with a representative of the imperial family.
The result of the study is the conclusion about the dominant nature of the transfer of imperial power according to the consanguineous principle throughout most of the history of the Roman Empire.

Author Biography

Nikita A. Gudkov, Belgorod National Research University

Postgraduate Student of the Department of World History, Faculty of History and Philology, Belgorod National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

References

Аврелий Виктор. 1961. Sextus Aurelius Victor. Liber De Caesaribus. Rec. F. Pichlmayer. Leipzig. 210.

Аммиан Марцеллин. 1786. Ammiani Marcellini Rerum gestarum qui de XXXI supersunt libri XVIII ad optimas editiones collati praemittitur notitia literar-ia: Accedunt ind. Studiis Soc. Bipontinae. – Biponti [Zweibrücken]. 358.

Гай Аноним. 2019. После Рима. 192–430 по Рождеству. От «солдатских императоров» до Карла Великого. Acta Diurna. 312.

Глушанин Е.П., Корнева И.В. 2007. Представления о легитимности императорской власти в IV веке. Война и мир в истории Европы: сборник научных статей памяти профессора Е.П. Глушанина. Барнаул. Изд-во Алтайского ун-та, 35–43.

Голдсуорти А. 2014. Падение Запада. Медленная смерть Римской империи. М., АСТ. 733.

Зосим. 1887. Zosimus. Historia nova. Ed. L. Mendelsohn. Lips., 1887. 367.

Олимпиодор. 1870. Olympiodorus. Fragmenta, Historici Graeci minores, Vol I. Ed. by L.A. Dindorf. Lips. 204–274.

Томпсон Э. 2021. Гунны. Грозные воины степей. Пер. Л.А. Игоревского. М., Центрполиграф. 256.

Уильям С. 2014. Диоклетиан: реставратор Римской империи. Перевод И.И. Хазановой. СПб., Евразия. 369.

Хизер П. 2011. Падение римской империи. М., АСТ. Астрель. 795.

Хизер П. 2016. Великие завоевания варваров. Падение Рима и рождение Европы. М., Центрполиграф. 830.

Barnwell P. 1993. Emperors, Prefects and Kings: The Roman West, 395–565. Chapel Hill. 256.

Bury J. 1923. History of the later Roman Empire: from the death of Theodosius I to the death of Justinian (A.D. 395 to A.D. 565). Vol. I. 542.

Carson G. 1959. The mints and coinage of Carausius and Allectus. JBAA. Vol. XXII: 33–40.

Cornelii Taciti Annalium. 1904. Ed. K. Nipperdey. Berlin. 278.

Demandt A. 1989. Die Spätantike. Römische Geschichte von Diocletian bis Justinian, 284–565 n. Chr. München, 612.

Eusebius. 1867. Pamphili Caesariensis. Rec. G. Dindorfius. – Lipsiae: B.G. Teubneri. 729.

Flaig E. 1997. Für eine Konzeptionalisierung der Usurpation in Spätrömischen Reich. Usurpationen in der Spätantike. Stuttgart: 15–34.

In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: the Panegyrici Latini 1994. Introduction, Translation and Historical Commentary by C.E.V. Nixon and B.S. Rodgers. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford. 744.

Jones A. H. M. 1964. The Later Roman Empire. A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey, 284–602. Vol. 1. Oxford. 786.

Kolb F. 2001. Herrscherideologie in der Spätantike. B. 416–417.

Krüger P. 1874. Codicis Iustiniani Fragmenta Veronensia. 84.

Lactantius. Opera omnia. P.1844. Patrologiae cursus completus. Ed. J.-P. Migne. Series latina. T. 6–7. 151.

Lucius Claudius Cassius Dio Cocceianus. 1863. Historia Romana. L. Dindorfii. – Lipsiae: B.G. Teubneri. 427.

Mommsen Th. Römische Kaisergeschichte. hrgb. von B. und A. Demandt. München, 1992. 432.

Procopii. 1905 Caesariensis Opus Omnia. V. 1–2. Rec. J. Hauru-Lipsiae: B.G. Teubneri. 552.

Schlinkert D. Vom Haus zum Hof. Aspekte höfischer Herrschaft in der Spätantike. Klio. 78. 1996. 2: 446–457.

Snyder C. 1998. An Age of Tyrants: Britain and the Britons A.D. 400–600. University Park. 320.

Szidat J. 1989. Imperator legitime declaratus (Ammian 30, 10, 5). Historia testis: Mélanges d’épigraphie, d’histoire ancienne, et de philologie offerts à T. Zawadski. Fribourg: 175–188.

The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. 1971. A.H.M. Jones. 1204.


Abstract views: 54

Share

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Gudkov, N. A. (2023). Principles of the Transfer of Imperial Power in Late Antique Society. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 50(2), 344-354. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2023-50-2-344-354

Issue

Section

Topical issues of world history