Is Emperor Marcian a Successor of Theodosius II or an Innovator?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-3-528-534Keywords:
Early Byzantium, Theodosius II, Marcian I, Pulcheria, HunsAbstract
Emperor Marcian was highly appreciated for his activity in the writings of Byzantine historians such as Hermias Sozomen, Socrates Scholasticus, Evagrius, etc. In their writings, he was described as an ideal ruler, compared with Constantine the Great. For a long time, the same opinion was held by many subsequent researchers of Late antiquity, who considered the era of Marcian as the «golden age» of Byzantium, and the activities of his predecessor Theodosius the Younger as the fruitless. However, recently the reverse process has been taking place in historiography – a decrease in the assessment of the Marcian era, which reflects the progress and development of the study of Byzantine history by expanding horizons and analysis from a more objective and neutral point of view, as far as possible. In general, Marcian is not a ruler who had a significant impact on the history of the Byzantine Empire, since the foundations of statehood were laid by Theodosius II. The era of the latter is characterized by the first long reign of an emperor born in Constantinople; the first regime carried out from there (taking into account minor campaigns) continuously for four decades; kingship most marked by Christian piety; close relationship between the emperor and the Greek-speaking Church.
Downloads
References
Чуева Ю.Ю. 2017. Знатные женщины Ранней Византии в контексте вертикальной социальной мобильности. Автореф. канд. дисс. Белгород, 28.
Babcock M.A. 2005. The Night Attila Died: Solving the Murder of Attila the Hun (1st ed.). Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan, 324.
Bjornlie M.S. 2016. The Life and Legacy of Constantine: Traditions through the Ages. New York, Taylor and Francis, 238.
Burgess R.W. 1993–1994. The Accession of Marcian in the Light of Chalcedonian Apologetic and Monophysite Polemic. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 86/87, 47–68.
Bury J.B. 1889. History of the Later Roman Empire. Vol. 2. London, 579.
Croke B. 1978. The Date and Circumstances of Marcian's Decease. Byzantion, 48: 5–9.
Elton H. 2018. The Roman Empire in Late Antiquity: A Political and Military History. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 398.
Hohlfelder R.L. 1984. Marcian’s gamble: a reassessment of eastern imperial policy toward Attila A. D. 450–453, AJAH 9: 54–69.
Holum K.G. 1989. Theodosian Empresses: Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity. Oakland, California, University of California Press, 276.
Illski K. 2005. Der schwache Kaiser Theodosios? Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie. Beitrage zur Byzantinistischen Geschichte und Kultur. Mainzer Veroffentlichungen zur Byzantinistik, 7. Wiesbaden: 3–6.
Jones A.H.M., Martindale J. R., Morris J. 1980. The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Volume 2, A. D. 395–527. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1355.
Jones A.H.M. 1964. The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey. Vol. 1. Oklahoma, Johns Hopkins University Press, 766.
Kelly C. 2010. The End of Empire: Attila the Hun & the Fall of Rome. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 370.
Kelly C. 2013. Theodosius II: Rethinking the Roman Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 324.
Klein K. 2018. Kaiser Marcian und die Monophysiten. Gymnasium. 125 (3): 251–273.
Lee A.D. 2013. From Rome to Byzantium. A. D. 363–565. The Transformation of Ancient Rome. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 338.
Maenchen-Helfen O.J. 1973. The world of the Huns. Berkeley, Los Angeles, СUP, 602.
McEvoy M.A. 2013. Child Emperor Rule in the Late Roman West, A. D. 367–455. Oxford University Press, 367.
Millar F. 2006. Greek Roman Empire. Power and belief under Theodosius II (408–450). Berkley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press, 274.
Pharr C., Davidson T.S., Pharr M.B. 2001. The Theodosian Code and Novels, and the Sirmondian Constitutions. Union, Lawbook Exchange, 643.
Thompson E.A. 1950. The Foreign Policies of Theodosius II and Marcian. Hermathena, 76: 58–75.
Wessel S. 2001. The ecclesiastical policy of Theodosius II. Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum, 33, 285–308.
Zuckerman С. 1994. L’empire d’Orient et les Huns: notes sur Priscus. T&MByz, 12: 159–182.
Abstract views: 148
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Via in tempore. History and political science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
