Development of digital political agitation: from Howard Dean to Donald Trump

Authors

  • Artur А. Zavyalov Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2021-48-1-249-258

Keywords:

microtargeting, personalization, interactivity, election campaign, social pages, political bloggers, subscribers, political agitation, social media

Abstract

The aim of this work was to highlight the changes in the methods of agitation, particular the use of social media in election campaigns. As the main method for writing the article, was used the case method. In particular, the election campaigns of several presidents of the United States of America. By examining the development of political groups in social networks, we can observe what is happening in real time. In the future, this could help identify groups of voters who vote based on the beliefs formed by social media, and better understand both the behavior of the electorate and the problems that motivate voters. The study of social media allows you to watch these processes online, while surveys and analysis in traditional media do not provide such an opportunity.

Author Biography

Artur А. Zavyalov, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

applicant for the degree of candidate of political sciences,
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

References

Bode L., Vraga E.K. 2014. Porismita Borah and Dhavan V. Shah, A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and Its Democratic Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Volume 19, Issue 3, April

Christensen H.S. 2011. Political Activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or Political Participation by Other Means? First Monday, Vol. 16.

Cortese J., Proffitt J.M. 2009. Political Messages in the First Presidential YouTube Election: A Content Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' YouTube Sites (paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication), Boston, Massachusetts, August 5–8.

Fraser M., Dutta S. 2008. “Barack Obama and the Facebook Election,” US News and World Report, November 19. URL: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/19/barack-obama-and-the-facebook-election (дата обращения: 04.10.2020).

Gueorguieva V. 2008. Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the 2006 Election Cycle and Beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 26: 288–300.

Madden M. 2008. Barack Obama's Super Marketing Machine, Salon, July 16. URL: http://www.salon.com/2008/07/16/obama_data/ (дата обращения: 16.09.2020).

Morozov E. 2009. The Brave New World of Slacktivism, Foreign Policy, 19 May. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/. (дата обращения: 26.06.2015)

Rasiej A., Sifry M.L. 2008. The Web: 2008's Winning Ticket, Politico, November 12. URL: http://www.politico.com/story/2008/11/the-web-2008s-winning-ticket-015520 (дата обращения: 11.08.2020).

Singel R. 2004. Net Politics Down but Not Out, Wired, February 2, (дата доступа: 17.09.2015). (URL) http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/2004/02/62123.

Towner T.L., Dulio D. 2011. The Web 2.0 Election: Does the Online Medium Matter? The Journal of Political Marketing, 10: 165–188.

Trippi J., Kerbel M.R., Bloom J.D. 2005. Blog for America and Civic Involvement. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10: 3–27.

Trump credits social media for his election. URL: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/10/20/trump-social-media-election-244009.

Trump supporters on Twitter during 2016 US election show little evidence of Russian infiltration – new research. URL: https://theconversation.com/trump-supporters-on-twitter-during-2016-us-election-show-little-evidence-of-russian-infiltration-new-research-115188.

Vargas J.A. 2007. Barack Obama, Social Networking King. The Washington Post, October 6. (URL) http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2007/10/06/barack_obama_social_networking.html (дата обращения: 13.09.2020).

Vargas J.A. 2008. Obama Raised Half a Billion Online. The Washington Post, November 20. URL: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/11/20/obama_raised_half_a_billion_on.html. (дата обращения: 15.09.2020).

Voting Y. 2010. CIRCLE (Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement). URL: http://www.civicyouth.org/quick-facts/youth-voting/ (дата обращения: 11.08.2015).

Wallsten K. 2010. Yes We Can': How Online Viewership, Blog Discussion, Campaign Statements, and Mainstream Media Coverage Produced a Viral Video Phenomenon. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7: 163–181.

Williams Ch.B., Gulati G.J. 2007. Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 Midterm Election, (paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association), Chicago, Illinois, 30 August – 2 September.

Williams Ch.B., Gula. ti G.J. 2009. Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and Congressional Elections 2006, 2008. APSA Toronto Meeting Paper 7.


Abstract views: 375

Share

Published

2021-07-08

How to Cite

ZavyalovA. А. (2021). Development of digital political agitation: from Howard Dean to Donald Trump. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science, 48(1), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2021-48-1-249-258

Issue

Section

Topical issues of political science